Each card shows what the study actually found, and its limits.
Foundational study
The foundational article describing how the brain perceives the difference between two tones in each ear as a beat.
Limitation: Not an effect study; it explains how the perception arises.
Oster, G. (1973). Auditory beats in the brain. Scientific American. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1073-94
Moderate evidence
A meta-analysis of 22 studies finding small to moderate effects of binaural beats on attention, anxiety and pain perception.
Limitation: Studies are small and varied; later replications are inconsistent.
Garcia-Argibay, M., Santed, M. A., Reales, J. M. (2019). Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: a meta-analysis. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1066-8
Moderate evidence
A systematic review finding inconsistent evidence that binaural beats "entrain" brainwaves on EEG.
Limitation: Most included studies are small and differ from one another.
Ingendoh, R. M., Posny, E. S., Heine, A. (2023). Binaural beats to entrain the brain? A systematic review of the effects of binaural beat stimulation on brain oscillatory activity. PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286023
Limited evidence
An EEG study showing 4 Hz and 10 Hz binaural beats increase alpha-band coherence between the two auditory cortices.
Limitation: The authors read this as the brain combining the two ears' sounds, not as brainwave entrainment; no behavioural effect was seen.
Solcà, M., Mottaz, A., Guggisberg, A. G. (2016). Binaural beats increase interhemispheric alpha-band coherence between auditory cortices. Hearing Research. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.011
Limited evidence
A brain imaging study in which natural sounds, compared with artificial ones, went along with outward attention and a rest response.
Limitation: Small sample, laboratory setting.
Gould van Praag, C. D., Garfinkel, S. N., Sparasci, O., et al. (2017). Mind-wandering and alterations to default mode network connectivity when listening to naturalistic versus artificial sounds. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/srep45273
Strong evidence
A Cochrane review of 13 studies (1,007 people) finding that listening to music probably raises subjective sleep quality.
Limitation: Participants knew their group; it is about music, not nature sounds.
Jespersen, K. V., Pando-Naude, V., Koenig, J., Jennum, P., Vuust, P. (2022). Listening to music for insomnia in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010459.pub3
Moderate evidence
A meta-analysis of 36 publications linking natural sounds with less stress and annoyance and a more positive mood.
Limitation: Studies vary and most are short laboratory listening sessions.
Buxton, R. T., Pearson, A. L., Allou, C., et al. (2021). A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. PNAS. doi:10.1073/pnas.2013097118
Foundational study
A study showing light flickering 40 times per second increased gamma waves in the visual cortex of mice.
Limitation: Done in mice. Sakin's light meditations do not flicker and are not based on this study.
Iaccarino, H. F., Singer, A. C., Martorell, A. J., et al. (2016). Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature20587
Limited evidence
A small study reporting that music tuned to 528 Hz went along with changes in some stress-related measures.
Limitation: Only 9 participants; very limited evidence.
Akimoto, K., Hu, A., Yamaguchi, T., Kobayashi, H. (2018). Effect of 528 Hz music on the endocrine system and autonomic nervous system. Health. doi:10.4236/health.2018.109088